[Businessmtg] Appointed positions

[Steve Rankin]

Hi Missy,
Yes, the Recording Secretary position is open.  
As for how any of the appointed positions are recruited, it is up to the appointing authority for the position in question to handle it.  Again, we rarely have specific protocols for how our trusted servants do their jobs, and those exceptions tend to be uniquely necessary for the position.  The Treasurer position is an excellent example of the group having a need for specific information in the treasurer reports, and reasonably well-defined processes for handling group funds.  That's typical of treasurer positions.
Unfortunately, we haven't had an elected Secretary since April 2020 when Jerry resigned early, which resulted in Beverly, the Secretary, automatically became the List Administrator.  However she quickly resigned as LA, so both positions were vacant.  When the dust settled, I was both acting List Administrator and acting Secretary.  Lynne was elected in late March this year, so I was relieved of that job - thank you Lynne.  
Back to the Recording Secretary.  Perhaps, it would help to understand where I'm at personally on a few things.  First, the idea of a Recording Secretary was not my idea, nor was I in favor of it.  I have serious doubts about the value of creating a new service position in ASP when we're not filling the ones we already have.  Plus, I see that position as increasing the complexity and workload of the Secretary, not lightening it.  Sure, once a Recording Secretary gets a handle on the job, it should work out well, but we have learned that it's something that requires some diligence on the part of the Secretary to ensure that the Recording Secretary draws between the lines.  
However, a majority of the Steering Committee wanted the position to lighten the load on the Secretary, so I went with majority of the Steering Committee and recommended the Recording Secretary position to the Business Meeting during the discussion leading to Motion 22.  Since Motion 22 passed, we now have a Recording Secretary position.  
The day after Motion 22 passed, a member approached me about volunteering for the position.  Except that she was already serving in another appointed position.  Since we don't allow members to hold multiple positions, she'd have to wait a couple of months to rotate.  I replied the following day, describing that as well as more about the position, but she didn't respond.  I wrote her a couple more times, but never heard from her again, although she's still active in ASP.  
Hence, one of the reasons why I don't see this as a benefit for the Secretary - the challenges of working with someone to maintain the website is simply more work, not less for the Secretary.
My bottom line?  Please don't expect me to devote my time and energy to recruiting someone to a position that I don't feel is necessary to the functioning of ASP, especially while much more important positions are vacant.  
The same is true for the At-Large positions on the Steering Committee.  Under ideal circumstances, the At-Large positions would serve as a voice for the members in addition to the full slate of officers with actual jobs to do on the Steering Committee.  However, with important positions and actual jobs to do, such as the Secretary, Treasurer and Group Rep, I not only have no intention of recruiting anyone to an At-Large position, I am quite simply not in favor of filling them.  Back in 2016 & 2017, during a brief period where great efforts were made to fill all the service positions to the max, and two members were elected to At-Large positions on the Steering Committee.  One got involved and participated while the other did not.  
As for trying to recruit elected officers from the general membership in the recovery meeting?  My experience is that members who wish to serve Al-Anon as a part of their recovery, will get involved in the meeting.  We announce every Business Meeting in the recovery meeting, with the agenda of the meeting.  Sometimes that includes something about trusted servants, elections, etc.  If someone is really interested in service and serving, they'll come to our Business Meetings.  
We have a total of 19 members in this month's Business Meeting; 15 regular members and 4 from the Steering Committee.  Of the 15, two are Daily Chair - THANK YOU! - and none are Greeters.  One of the "regular" members has spoken with me in recent history about serving and I really hope she does, just like I hope that some of the Daily Chairs and Greeters chose to volunteer to serve.  
My objective is to make service in ASP worthwhile to your recovery, and in the process make ASP the best online meeting extant.  That doesn't necessarily mean it's always easy, or fun.  If fact, you might even get thoroughly PO'd at me sometimes.  That's OK.  I can be a crusty old fart that is stuck on the idea keeping ASP's nose stuck to the grindstone of Al-Anon principles.
If you got this far, you survived my rambling.  😊
Love and SERENITY,
Steve