[Businessmtg] Excess Prudent Reserve Discussion
logmark at comcast.net
logmark at comcast.net
Tue Oct 18 08:53:07 PDT 2011
Biz-Pals,
It seems we're beginning to polarize rather than
move toward a consensus. Good, strong points
on both extremes - some of them unresolvable by
ASP at this point in time perhaps.
I admit I'm on the less flexible end of this continuum.
If the old OLA-IS is now the WSO's On-line Al-Anon
Outreach Committee ( OAOC ) by agreement between those
two outfits, then by golly I follow the Service Manual
which accepts all donations into the General fund, not
permitting earmarking of funds, ....etc.,etc.
Now I've learned that its okay to disagree within
Al-Anon. So when another member has other criteria
which leads them to other positions I am not worried.
[What would an Al-Anon be without strong opinions?
I dunno either... :-) ]
What is bothering me is that we now have approximately
$1,000 !!!
in our treasury above our Prudent Reserve requirement.
So I'm very willing to go along with donating
~ $500.00 to the WSO, and
~ $500.00 to what we are calling the OLA-IS even
if it is acting as the WSO's OAOC .
>From what I have heard they send what they don't use/need
on to the WSO anyway. In any case our excess funds have the
opportunity to help Al-Anon as a whole. Sitting in our Treasury
our money does no work at all.
Am I in the neighborhood of a potential consensus, or are
we going to be unable to resolve this?
Hug$,
Jerry
-
More information about the Businessmtg
mailing list