[Businessmtg] Current original agenda Oct bus meeting and the late addition

[Jane Anon]

We are only discussing one topic at a time because we finished discussing
the SC positions. Voting is going on, but the added members were not given
the link for those polls. So there is no reason not to discuss this topic.

All you can really argue is that the motion was made prematurely, but
reversion to Robert's Rules is at the chair's discretion, I believe. I
can't see how allowing the members to voice their opinions on websites they
are currently using violates any Al-Anon traditions or warranties.

Honestly, the hostility in this meeting is breath-taking, though I no
longer find it surprising. Sandie is chairing the meeting, setting and
following an agenda which is at her discretion to do. If you want to vote
against the website or discuss it further before a vote is taken, ok, but I
don't think it's appropriate to continually undermine the chair in this way.



On Oct 17, 2017 7:26 PM, "Anne OHara" <aohara77 at comcast.net> wrote:

> All,  enough evidence has been produced that confirms this late addition
> is totally illegitimate. No motion should have ever been brought forward. I
> object to the list administrators coercion in pushing it through when our
> policies are clear. It is a total disregard of Al-Anon traditions, concepts
> and warranties.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> _______________________________________________
> The ASP Instruction page is http://asp-afg.org/members/asp-instructions/
>
> The ASP web site for ASP members is http://www.asp-afg.org/Members/
>
> For assistance with other ASP issues, contact the List Administrator, at
> list_administrator at asp-afg.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> Businessmtg mailing list
> Businessmtg at asp-afg.org
> http://www.asp-afg.org/mailman/listinfo/businessmtg
>