[Businessmtg] Founders

[Steve Rankin]

Hi ASPers,
Some interesting ideas are popping up.  I'd like to respond to some of them.

A.  The number of people on the Steering Committee.  I believe the goal here
should be to have the number of people on the SC that it takes to run ASP;
no more and no less.  While some may think that more members on the SC is a
good thing, I disagree.  Adding members for the sake of adding members, or
to have more voices in some of the decisions, tends to result in several
problems.  If you've ever worked on committees, you should know that the
larger the committee, the more difficult it tends to be to get the committee
informed on an issue, and the more difficult it tends to be to develop a
group conscience of the committee.  Remember that the Steering Committee
does NOT make policy decisions at ASP; those decisions belong to the members
of ASP via the Business Meeting.  The job of the SC is to administer the
day-to-day affairs of ASP behind the scenes.  
The administration of ASP is divided into sections with an individual
officer responsible for each portion of the administration: List
Administrator to run the server and overall big picture, Greeter Chair to
process new members, Secretary to run the daily meetings and business
meetings, Treasurer to handle the finances.  And we're looking at the issue
of adding a Group Representative to represent ASP to the Al-Anon Fellowship
and greater service structure.  We don't need any other jobs done, therefore
we don't need any other people on the Steering Committee.

B.  Yes, it is true that Concept 3 says "The right of decision makes for
effective leadership."  However, the right of decision only applies to the
responsibilities that are assigned to the position.  For example, as the
List Administrator, I am the primary leader of the Steering Committee.
However, that does not give me the authority to decide how many Greeters are
needed, because I don't have the responsibility to run the greeter
operation.  Kelley does, so she gets to decide how many Greeters she needs
to get that job done.  OTOH, that does not mean that Kelley gets to make any
decision she wishes with the Greeter operation.  We have established
protocols and practices that Kelley has to work with.  Ditto for the
Treasurer, Secretary, etc.  One of the problems that occurs in Al-Anon is
that newly elected trusted servants often think that being elected to serve
gives them the OK to do what they wish with their new position.  Wrong.
They were elected to do the job that the group elected them to do.

C.  ASP does not have a clean mechanism that allows for dealing with getting
the job done when a service position is vacant.  Sometimes, when a trusted
servant gets to the end of their 3-year term, they continue in the position
until they are replaced in an election.  That sounds like a plan, however
that also enables the group to avoid the consequences of not filling the
position.  When did it become the outgoing trusted servant's decision to
extend their term beyond the term they were elected for?  Who gave them that
authority?

Without a simple mechanism to address the duties of vacant positions, it's a
crap shoot what happens.  What we are recommending is a mechanism that
allows the members of the SC to ask the Founder(s) to perform some task or
duty.

D.  Someone suggested that the SC be allowed to ask an "experienced member"
of ASP to serve.  I see several problems with that scenario.  
First off, it raises the question of what an "experienced member" of ASP is.

Secondly, it opens the door to patronage.  Let's say we have a vacancy, and
I have a sponsee that I want to get involved, so I sweet talk the SC into
putting this sponsee into that service position.  Temporarily, of course,
but in the process I also padded the SC with a vote on my side.  Believe me
when I say I've seen this done more than once. 
Third, it sets up a scenario where members can and will defeat the term of
office, or make test runs of service positions without making the commitment
needed to be elected to the position, or simply wants to be on the SC for a
short time so they can vote on the SC on some issue.  If those sound
far-fetched. . ., they are not.
What about ASP twenty or thirty years from now?  Frankly, I'm not worried
about ASP then.  If I'm still around annoying people then, I'd be 105, but
the principle that I see involved is one day at a time.  I did my best to do
the right thing 25 years when I set up ASP and it's structure.  It's not
perfect, but it's worked well for 25 years.  If we do the right thing today,
it will probably continue to work.  And if it turns out to need improvement
in the future, then that decision belongs to whoever is here then.
Hugs,
Steve