[Businessmtg] Fwd: Point of Order - Consensus reached on all points mentioned in Chair's call for a motion?

[Jerry]

Sorry, Originally sent to the SC by accident, so resending to the BM. Could be considered part of a discussion of the motion...
Jerry

-------- Original Message --------
 Subject: Re: [Businessmtg] Point of Order - Consensus reached on all points mentioned in Chair's call for a motion?
 From: Jerry <logmark at comcast.net>
 Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2023, 6:56 PM
 To: steering_committee at asp-afg.org
 CC: 

All,

Stated Steering Committee's recommendation:

* That the Steering Committee (SC) is authorized to solicit volunteers for service on the SC,

Unnecessary. The SC already puts out calls for volunteers. No clarity on whether volunteers standing for office with qualifications would supersede any solicited by the SC. Opens the door for targeting specific candidates who agree with the SC and rejecting candidates who may have disagreements with them. Could result in "packing" the SC to obtain predetermined outcomes.

* That the SC is responsible for interviewing and vetting said 
volunteers as it sees fit,

Remove "as it sees fit." No consensus mentioned about a new minimum, or statement regarding temporary or length of terms; guidelines on process. Removes BM from reviewing resumes.

* That the SC may recommend candidates to the BM by unanimous vote of the SC,

Consensus reached

* That candidates recommended by the SC may not meet ASP requirements for prior membership or service,

Consensus reached

* That all other requirements and procedures involving the election of officers by the members in the Business Meeting apply.

Check.

This note is rushed because I'm on the way out to a meeting. Can we hold motions until more thought can be given to details so the language can be worked into a motion?

Thanks,
Jerry
-