[Businessmtg] clarification

[Sandie Parkker]

Hi biz pals.  I would just like to clarify my previous email with intents
and purposes:

"The SC and the BM have agreed to accept that this motion is a direct
violation of established ASP policy as it stands at this time."

"that the BM and SC will meet and be updated how the plan has been working,
being handled and implemented for the next three BM, May, July, Sept."

"That we will discuss whether or not we wish to renew this plan or make a
new plan in November of 2023."

My purpose here is to establish that this is not just something that will
be done and fall by the wayside.  My idea. Just a guideline, check and or
balance.

It has been stated that this is a violation of our current policy.  There
has also been a couple of talking points in our previous discussion on
making the motion.  That this plan be a temporary solution and doing this
for six months.

I am looking at this issue from all angles so I can make a clear decision.
If what I have suggested does not fly it does not fly.  Hey there still is
the minority opinion.  I have not made up my mind yet whether the whole
motion is good or bad.  I was not available at the time when a call for a
consensus was made or  if someone wanted or needed more discussion time.
Your loss.  I don't take anything that goes on in the BM lightly.  I like
to THINK things thru.

OTOH, though does this mean that people are not thinking this thru or does
it mean no one cares what happens to our meeting and or policies? I have
seen and experienced a packed SC.  And how people can be lead along blindly
including myself and think they "see".  I can sit back and do nothing with
the best of them also.  But does that help the health of the meeting?

These are my thoughts. Take what you like and leave the rest.
Hugs,
Beverly