[Businessmtg] Business Meeting Motion

[Steve Rankin]

Hi Linda,

My hunch is that much of the confusion around this motion comes from what is
being said about the motion by various members.  I believe that the members
of the SC have been consistent and rather clear about what this motion does
and what it doesn't do.  

Vacancies on the SC has been a permanent problem at ASP.  I don't know what
anyone would expect this motion to be a temporary solution to a permanent
problem.  

Like most words in the English language, solicit has several meanings.  
SOLICIT - intransitive verb
1. To seek to obtain by persuasion, entreaty, or formal application.
2. To petition persistently; importune.
3. To commit the criminal offense of enticing or inciting (another) to
commit an illegal act.
I'd suggest choosing Door #1.

The Steering Committee has no control over when members do stuff, including
volunteering for service.  As a result, it is entirely possible that the SC
could be in the midst of vetting a less-than-qualified member when a fully
qualified member submits a resume.  If we believe that the "
less-than-qualified" member is worth recommending to the BM, then why would
we not do exactly that. So, yes, it is possible that the SC could present
two members to the BM for consideration.  

Love and SERENITY,
Steve






-----Original Message-----
From: Businessmtg On Behalf Of LindaLee H
Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2023 7:22 PM
To: steve at serenitysys.com
Cc: ASP Business <businessmtg at asp-afg.org>
Subject: [Businessmtg] Business Meeting Motion

   Hi Business Friends,

   I confess I am so confused right now regarding the motion on the floor,
   that I am unable to make an `informed' decision.  I thought I
   understood in the beginning that the Steering Committee was asking for
   permission to vet a applicant who had less than ASP stated service
   requirements in cases where positions have remained vacant.

   I thought this was hoped to be a temporary solution to an existing
   problem/need.


   I assumed that if a person who fit the qualifications applied for a
   position, then this `soliciting' would not apply.  (I cannot explain
   why the word `solicit' bothers me so much, and that is not part of the
   discussion - just a personal comment.)


   Now I'm getting the impression that the SC may submit a name they have
   vetted who does not meet the requirements fully, even though a person
   who does has submitted their name.  Is this accurate?


   Bottom line, with my boggled brain, if we were to vote today, I would
   have to vote against because I don't understand what I'm voting for, or
   I would have to abstain for the same reason.

   Hugs, Linda


   Sent from [1]Mail for Windows

References

   1. https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986
____________________________
To Unsubscribe, go to: http://www.asp-afg.org/mailman/listinfo/asp
The ASP web site with all kinds of info for ASP members is
http://asp-afg.org/members/ For assistance with other ASP issues, contact
Steve the Founder of ASP, at steve at serenitysys.com


-- 
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
www.avg.com