[Businessmtg] Minority opinion comment:

[Sandie Parkker]

Thank you for your patience as this is the first time I am contributing in
this manner.  I am learning and growing also.

This is my minority opinion.    I do not agree at all with this consensus.
I believe that this consensus does not qualify as a consensus because it is
all based on reactions to fear of losing anonymity related to email
exposure. Feelings are not facts.  That aspect was discussed thoroughly by
myself and another member.  Email is out there it is the technological
climate we live with/ in.

 I just reread one share and the person stated that “I don’t think we
should retain any archives.”   This statement is without any concrete
explanation as to why to  delete them.  Just get rid of them.  I don’t
think this is an acceptable reason to remove an important resource and a
useful part of the memory of this unique email group.

IMHO, emails with vague ‘I do not think the archives are necessary’…….are
not fact based.  They are not costing us time, money or management and they
are useful to members and SC alike…..and it is password protected.

When I go to my sponsor with a community issue I am faced with doing an
inventory for my part and coming up with a way to make myself comfortable.
Why shouldn’t other folks be responsible for their fears???  That’s a big
part of what program is all about.

Thank you for your time and patience in this matter.

Beverly

On Wed, Jul 16, 2025 at 9:44 PM <aohara77 at comcast.net> wrote:

> Good question.  Is this something different than what you offered last
> week as we worked through the consensus discussion and details?
>
>
>
> Hugs,
>
>
>
> Anne O
>
>
>
> *From:* Sandie Parkker <sandieparkker at gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 16, 2025 9:33 PM
> *To:* Anne OHara <aohara77 at comcast.net>
> *Subject:* Re: [Businessmtg] A note from the Business Meeting
> Secretary/Facilitator - with typo corrected
>
>
>
> Hi Anne.  This is Beverly.  I would like to give a minority opinion on the
> consensus.  When is the time to do this?
>
> Thank you.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2025, 9:22 PM aohara77--- via Businessmtg <
> businessmtg at asp-afg.org> wrote:
>
> Oops,
>
> Just a subtle change, but important as we move forward - it should have
> been recovery meeting not 'recover' meeting.
>
> Apologies for the disruption.
>
> Archiving Member Shares - the server will continue to archive shares of
> ASP’s recovery meeting, however
>
> *       Members will not have access to the recovery meeting archives.
> *       The Founders and current List Administrator and other active
> members of the Steering Committee will have access to the recovery meeting
> archives for their assigned administrative duties and business purposes
>
>
> Anne O
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Businessmtg <businessmtg-bounces+aohara77=comcast.net at asp-afg.org>
> On Behalf Of aohara77--- via Businessmtg
> Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2025 7:52 PM
> To: aohara77 at comcast.net
> Cc: ASP Business <businessmtg at asp-afg.org>
> Subject: [Businessmtg] A note from the Business Meeting
> Secretary/Facilitator
>
> Hi all,  it is amazing how much can happen in a day 😊
>
>
>
> It is up to the Business meeting secretary to gather the information and
> state the consensus.  And be sure that the consensus is fully on topic.  We
> are not yet ready for a motion.  I do, however, appreciate the enthusiasm.
> The motion made earlier today is null and void.
>
>
>
> Instead, we must first agree on the language associated with the
> consensus.  We started this phase of the meeting evenly split on the
> archiving topic – some who are not in favor of compromise and others who
> are.  However, based on what I have read, this is now the consensus that
> includes compromise and the consensus should clearly state/include the
> boundaries.
>
>
>
> Archiving Member Shares - the server will continue to archive shares of
> ASP’s recovery meeting, however
>
> *       Members will not have access to the recover meeting archives.
> *       The Founders and current List Administrator and other active
> members of the Steering Committee will have access to the recovery meeting
> archives for their assigned administrative duties and business purposes
>
>
>
> We can now move on to the next step which is thoughtful feedback on the
> language presented in the consensus.  We are NOT yet ready for a motion, I
> will ask for the motion to be made when folks have given their input into
> the language of the consensus.
>
>
>
> Hugs,
>
>
>
> Anne O
>
>
>
> ____________________________
> To Unsubscribe, go to: http://www.asp-afg.org/mailman/listinfo/asp
> The ASP web site with all kinds of info for ASP members is
> http://asp-afg.org/members/ For assistance with other ASP issues, contact
> Lynne, the List Administrator of ASP, at lynne at asp-afg.org
>
>
> ____________________________
> To Unsubscribe, go to: http://www.asp-afg.org/mailman/listinfo/asp
> The ASP web site with all kinds of info for ASP members is
> http://asp-afg.org/members/
> For assistance with other ASP issues, contact Lynne, the List
> Administrator of ASP, at lynne at asp-afg.org
>
>