[Businessmtg] **** Motion #4 Update Topic - Opening Part 3

[travelynne2]

Thanks Steve for the background to this motion! And to you and the other steering committee members for your work on this and all other aspects of keeping ASP running. 

I am in favor of eliminating the webmaster position and rolling the duties into the Secretary and recommending that the Secretary to appoint an assistant. 

I have two questions just so I can understand how things work a little better. But my support doesn’t change with the answers. :) 

 First, the Secretary is recommended to appoint an assistant, but not required, right? So having an assistant could vary by Secretary - or even a Secretary could choose to have an assistant for a year and then go without for the remainder of their term?

Second, I believe you mentioned in a previous business meeting that even though we are discussing each of these 3 parts of motion 4 separately, there will only be ONE vote to revise motion 4 that will include ALL of the updated text for motion 4? So we can’t vote yes on the Secretary part but no on the group representative part? It is yes to all of it or no to all of it? 

Thanks! 
Lynne

Sent from my iPhone

> On Sep 13, 2021, at 1:19 PM, Steve Rankin <steve at serenitysys.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi ASPers . . . aka Part 3 of the opening of this topic.
> I'd like to open the discussion of the changes to the Secretary & Web Master
> service positions at ASP.
> The gist of what we are recommending is that the Secretary absorb the duties
> of the Web Master position and delete the Web Master position.  We are also
> recommending that the Secretary may appoint an assistant, who may be tasked
> with some of the Secretary's service work, in qualify as the ASP service
> prerequisite for eligibility to serve on the Steering Committee. 
> Why?  The reality is that the actual work of the Web Master is extremely
> little.  If you look at the archives of the Business Meeting, you would see
> that the report of the Web Master is generally another version of this
> month's report "No new updates."  This isn't meant to be a reflection of the
> Web Master, but the reality of the position.  Eliminating the ELECTED
> position and replacing it with an APPOINTED position offers several
> advantages:
> *  It is much easier to fill the position.
> *  It does not waste an eligible member on such a minor service position
> *  It leaves an eligible member available for service in other Steering
> Committee positions that have a real need for a qualified eligible member.
> Discussion of this topic is open - please do not discuss any other topic at
> this time.
> Hugs,
> Steve
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ____________________________
> To Unsubscribe, go to: http://www.asp-afg.org/mailman/listinfo/asp
> The ASP web site with all kinds of info for ASP members is
> http://asp-afg.org/members/ For assistance with other ASP issues, contact
> Steve the Founder of ASP, at steve at serenitysys.com
> 
> 
> ____________________________
> To Unsubscribe, go to: http://www.asp-afg.org/mailman/listinfo/asp
> The ASP web site with all kinds of info for ASP members is http://asp-afg.org/members/
> For assistance with other ASP issues, contact Steve the Founder of ASP, at steve at serenitysys.com